Tag Archives: Recommended Reading

A Nonprofit News Round-Up

roundupToday I just have a short round up of interesting items from the last few weeks.  But I first want to say thanks to the Nonprofit Congress Blog for mentioning this blog in the Nonprofit Blog Carnival it recently hosted.

This piece is from mid May but it is worth another mention.  The article is on administration costs and charity ratings from the Good Intentions Are Not Enough blog.  The premise is that the focus on administrative costs can do harm than good, and I agree with the author’s arguments.

This article from the Nonprofit Professionals Advisory Group is a nice wrap up of the President’s Stimulus plan and its possible effects for the nonprofit sector.  From helping organizations stay afloat to expanding others, there is a lot to know about the plan.

Our sector is not immune to questionable ethical decisions.  This article from the Stanford Social Innovation Review highlights some of the issues specific to the nonprofit sector and ways to promote ethical behavior in charitable organizations.

When groups talk about saving money all options should be on the table.  But eliminating Directors and Officers liability insurance is a risky option.  This article gives some good reasons why you shouldn’t cut it and some tips about judging your own coverage or shopping for other coverage.  Here is a good resource for D&O insurance and other organizational coverages.

Nonprofit Resources – Three helpful items

Have a question about a nonprofit issue?

BoardSource has a really nice Question and Answer section.  Some of the items are member only but there is plenty of free information available.  This site also has a bunch of Q&A’s here.

How does a nonprofit go out of business?

While there may be some state specific rules you’ll need to look up, the IRS recently published this piece on how to terminate an organization.

Private Inurement, Excess Compensation, Intermediate Sanctions, and Rebuttable Presumption

This free publication from GuideStar outlines what the IRS expects of charities and how we can comply with the rules that govern 501(c)(3) organizations.

Monday Morning News

new-990-imageIn the third and final installment of my news and information updates that clean out my in-boxes (the last two are here and here), I will lead off with two time sensitive items.

1. 990, 990-EZ, 990-PF and 990-N

Is your organization on a calendar fiscal year?  Then your forms are do this Friday, May 15, 2009.  From the IRS:

Calendar year exempt organizations that file Forms 990, 990-PF, or 990-EZ are reminded that their annual information returns are due on May 15. An organization may request an initial automatic extension of time to file its annual information return by filing Form 8868 by the due date of the return. For more information, see Form 8868 and its instructions [a pdf].

Forms 990, 990-EZ and 990-PF for non-calendar year organizations are due on the 15th day of the 5th month following the end of their annual accounting period.

Form 990-N filers cannot get an extension to file.  Information about the 990-N can be found here.

Guidestar has a nice piece on what the governance aspects of the new forms are, you can read it here.

Continue reading

Nonprofit News Roundup: Laws and Money

roundupSmart things from other parts of the web.  More good blog posts will be found at the end of this month when the Nonprofit Congress Blog hosts the Nonprofit Blog CarnivalClick through for more details.

Human Resources News For California Nonprofits

Two pieces from What’s New in Employment Law from earlier this year that detail the differences and similarities between California and Federal rules in charts provided by The California Fair Employment and Housing Commission: The comparison between the Federal ADA rules (both new and old) and the California rules and the FMLA and CA’s Family Rights Act and Pregnancy Disability Leave law.

Another post from them details the updates to to CA’s Alternative Work Week law.  I like the changes.

Meal and rest period information for employers as a result of a recent court case.

Continue reading